Dr. Alon Ben-Meir*
 Turkey’s President Erdogan could have emerged from the Israel-Hamas war as a peacemaker. Instead, being absorbed by fake piety, hypocrisy, and folly, he chose to fan the flames of the horrific war, further poisoning the atmosphere and intensifying the hostility and hatred between Israel and the Palestinians. Can Erdogan shed his hypocrisy and play a constructive role? 
New York (The Hawk): Whenever I write about Turkey’s President Erdogan, I find it hard to articulate what kind of legacy this man wants to leave behind. He had every opportunity to become a great leader of a great nation but miserably failed. His self-aggrandizement, fake religious zeal, and ever-growing lust for power prevented him from discerning what was best for his country and how to become a constructive and truthful leader, admired and respected at home and abroad, which he so desperately desired. Among his many failings, Erdogan missed one other significant opportunity that could have made him emerge as a regional peacemaker above all others. Instead of using his good offices to seize on the changing paradigm of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict resulting from Hamas’s horrific attack on Israeli communities, which led to the tragically unfolding Israel-Hamas war, and strive toward reconciliation between the two sides, he chose to foment greater hatred and resistance against Israel. He is a hypocrite, trying to exploit the tragic Israel-Hamas war only to enhance his bogus Islamic credentials. Not once has he condemned Hamas’ butchering of 1,200 innocent Israelis, but he did not hesitate to accuse the Israeli government of committing genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza. And with his customary scorn for Israel, he unabashedly told members of his Justice and Development Party, “I say clearly that Israel is a terror state; we are faced with a genocide.” At the same time, he stressed that “We will continue to see our Hamas brothers, who defend their homeland against occupiers, as the National Resistance of Palestine.” If such a statement—spewed from the mouth of a leader whose country committed genocide against nearly two million Armenians and hundreds of thousands of Greeks, and who is incarcerating tens of thousands of citizens while waging a relentless campaign against the PKK and the Syrian Kurdish community—is not the highest of hypocrisy, then what is? Meanwhile, notwithstanding his withdrawal of Turkey’s ambassador from Israel, he continues to trade with Israel in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Once again, he put his duplicity on full display, stating that Turkey is the only country that imposes trade restrictions on Israel for 54 products. What a big “sacrifice” coming from a self-proclaimed Islamist who presumably cares so much about “his Palestinian brothers” by banning the import of 54 Israeli products. I mention the above to put in context what Erdogan could have done differently to help advance a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, especially because Turkey recognized Israel in 1949, only a year after the country’s establishment, and has maintained diplomatic relations, albeit with some ups and downs, ever since. Over the years, tourism and trade between the two countries skyrocketed. Moreover, Israel helped upgrade much of Turkey’s air force while providing it with advanced technology for both military and civilian use. To be sure, regardless of Erdogan’s erratic behavior and his support of Hamas, Israel greatly valued its relations with Turkey because of the above and due to Ankara’s geostrategic importance. Erdogan and Hamas leaders have also enjoyed good relations, going back to the time Hamas ousted the Palestinian Authority from Gaza in 2007. There was an instant affinity between them, as both saw themselves as devout Sunni Islamists sharing the same religious values. Other than Shiite Iran, Hamas needed the support of a significant Sunni Muslim state with strong Western ties. At the same time, Erdogan sought to interject himself into the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and portray himself as the protector of the Palestinian cause, from which he could drive prestige and exert significant influence. To that end, he offered both financial support as well as a refuge for Hamas leaders, enabling them to operate from his country without any impediment or fear of being targeted by Israel. He further provided Turkish citizenship to senior Hamas leaders and wholeheartedly embraced them, even while Hamas was openly calling for Israel's destruction. Nevertheless, Erdogan was able to maintain good relations with both Israel and Hamas even though they viewed each other as an existential threat. It is these relationships with Israel and Hamas that Erdogan managed to preserve over the years that gave him a rare opportunity and advantage to, at a minimum, assist in mitigating Hamas’ conflict with Israel, especially at this juncture in the wake of the Israel-Hamas war and its unfolding calamity. Whereas Erdogan vehemently opposes the occupation of the West Bank and the blockade over Gaza, he also understands that Israel will not relinquish control over either territory as long as Hamas and other extremist Palestinians call for its destruction. He could have made it clear to Hamas’ leaders that even though successive Israeli leaders know that Hamas will never be in a position to destroy their country, they use Hamas’ narrative to justify the occupation and the blockade in the name of national security. Erdogan also knows that Israeli-Palestinian coexistence is not one of many options; it is the only option. Whether or not Hamas accepts this reality, there is nothing they can do about it. No one has more credibility with Hamas than Erdogan, who has earned their trust over the years for his unimpeachable backing and his defiance of the international community’s classification of Hamas as a terrorist group, as he views them as a national liberation movement. Israel may succeed in preventing Hamas from reconstituting itself as the governing authority in Gaza. But Hamas as a political movement will certainly persevere because it stood up to Israel, which has changed the dynamic of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and created a new paradigm, making it impossible to return to the status quo that existed before October 7, 2023. Turkey is the only country that recognizes and maintains diplomatic relations with Israel and, at the same time, enjoys warm relations with Hamas. Erdogan can utilize his unique position to start a conversation with Hamas leaders and awaken them to the reality of Israel from which they cannot escape. Israeli-Palestinian relations have indeed reached their nadir, and they have not been as poisonous as they currently are since 1948. But then, when there is a breakdown in a relationship of such magnitude, it also offers a historic opportunity for a breakthrough. Hamas has successfully, though in a horrific way, changed the dynamic of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and can claim victory even though they are being crushed in Gaza. Hamas brought back the two-state solution to the table to which the Palestinians badly aspire, and in a bizarre way, Hamas has significantly advanced that prospect. We do not know with certainty how and when the Gaza war will end, but we certainly know one thing. Both Hamas, in one form or another, and Israel will still be there at the end, and both must choose where they want to go from here. Erdogan now has a golden opportunity to use his influence on Hamas to moderate its position toward Israel, be a peacemaker instead of a warmonger, and open the door, however slightly, to a process of reconciliation, which is a prerequisite to reaching a lasting Israeli-Palestinian peace.
*Dr. Alon Ben-Meir is a retired professor of international relations at the Center for Global Affairs at NYU. He teaches courses on international negotiation and Middle Eastern studies.

Whenever I write about Turkey’s President Erdogan, I find it hard to articulate what kind of legacy this man wants to leave behind

Can Erdogan Shed His Duplicity And Do Something Right?

The entire country is currently in election mode. On one hand, the Bharatiya Janata Party is trying to form the government at the Center for the third consecutive time, while on the other hand, the opposition parties are trying to stop the BJP. The INDIA alliance, which includes the Congress, is attacking the BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. There are various parties in INDIA but Modi is mostly targeting Congress in his speeches. Although many issues are being discussed in the elections, the electoral scenario is dominated by Hindutva and nationalism of BJP and Muslim appeasement of Congress.  If BJP is talking about Hindutva and nationalism in the Lok Sabha elections, then this is nothing new for it. The issues of Hindutva and nationalism have become permanently associated with the BJP. Even though Congress has been alleging that BJP's Hindutva and nationalism are meant to win elections, it does not seem to have any impact on BJP and its supporting voters. Congress links BJP's Hindutva with religion whereas for BJP, Hindu is a symbol of culture. The Supreme Court has also said this. BJP's Hindutva includes every nationalist Indian. The party believes that identity as a Hindu is the cultural citizenship of every Indian. Hindu is not a religion, sect or creed. It is a cultural term. Thus, while BJP's stand is clear in this matter, Congress seems to be in a dilemma in this matter for the last ten years. Congress and its leaders are sometimes seen talking about taking Hindus along and sometimes returning to their old appeasement policy. Sometimes Rahul Gandhi tries to show his soft attitude towards Hindutva by worshiping in temples, wearing sacred thread and calling himself a Brahmin, then after a short time he forgets it and starts trying to attract Muslim voters towards the party. Obviously, Congress is not able to give up Muslim appeasement. When Congress recently released its election manifesto, it came under attack from all BJP leaders including PM Modi, Amit Shah, JP Nadda, Rajnath Singh. Modi said that Congress has sunk so much in the quagmire of appeasement that it can never come out of it. The manifesto of Congress seems to be the manifesto not of Congress but of Muslim League. Every page of it smells of Muslim League. Amit Shah said that Congress is an appeasement party. Four generations of Congress kept appeasing. She wants to bring back Muslim Personal Law.  In fact, Congress has promised the minorities in its declaration that if Congress gets a chance, it will respect and maintain the rights given to religious minorities under the Constitution. The party will re-implement the Maulana Azad Scholarship for studies abroad and increase the number of scholarships. Like every citizen, Congress has talked about giving freedom of dress, food, language and personal laws to minorities and promoting reforms in personal laws. In response to this, BJP is also raising the issue of Sachar Committee report. BJP says who is responsible for the plight of Muslims mentioned in the Sachar Committee report? Congress government was in power for decades, but Congress never thought about the social and economic upliftment of Muslims. Congress has always been using Muslims only as a vote bank.  Congress's love for Muslims is not reflected in this manifesto for the first time. His line has always been this. On one hand, BJP's Hindutva includes all nationalist Indians, while Congress talks only about minorities. It is well known that Muslims have been a big vote bank of Congress since the beginning, which they got separated from over time and the party is trying to cultivate them again. This has been clear from the statements of party leaders from time to time. Everyone still remembers the statement of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in which Singh had said that Muslims have the first right on the country's budget. In the Gujarat Assembly elections, Congress candidate from Sidhpur seat Chandan Thakor had said that only Muslims can save the Congress. There are many such examples.  It is fine if Congress keeps speaking for Muslims, but the party has made a big mistake by targeting Hindus. People have still not forgotten Congress leader P. Chidambaram's statement about saffron terrorism a decade and a half ago. By rejecting the invitation for the consecration ceremony of Shri Ram Lala in Shri Ram temple, Congress has hit its own foot.  Big leaders of Congress have been repeatedly explaining to their high command but the party is not taking any lesson from it. In the year 2014, after the crushing defeat of Congress in the Lok Sabha elections, senior leader A.K. Antony was entrusted with the responsibility of reviewing the defeat. Antony clearly said in the review report that the policy of Muslim appeasement adopted by Congress proved fatal for it.  Surprisingly, Congress still could not understand the situation on the ground and continued on the path of appeasement. Congress should have left the policies of appeasement and inspired the minority communities to join the mainstream of national upliftment and nationalism. Besides, they should have been awakened on the issues of national equality, Ek Bharat - Shrestha Bharat, equal civil rights, population control etc. so that their contribution in the upliftment of the nation and in solving the problems of the country would have been greater. But by not doing so, Congress always worked to divide the population of the country by promoting appeasement. Unreasonable opposition to the Citizenship Amendment Act is also becoming a thorn in the side of Congress. The party has been ignoring all those voices in which emphasis was laid on taking Hindus along. Other regional and national parties have also been following the path of appeasement. On the contrary, BJP also won the 2019 Lok Sabha elections by following the path of Hindutva and nationalism and now once again it is in front of the public on these issues. That means BJP has not made any change in its stand. He is firm on his issues and ideology. Now Shri Ram temple has also been constructed. The issue of Uniform Civil Code is also attracting the common people. Voters will definitely consider that where are the people who have ruled the country for most of the 75 years after independence, trying to take the country by playing the appeasement card? The people of the country will look at the sixteen years of BJP's rule (including the tenure of Atal government), in which the focus has been on the dream of national upliftment, developed India, best India, Vishwa Guru India. The big question is, which of Hindutva, nationalism and appeasement policy is going to have an impact? The question is also whether voters will vote in the name of nationalism, Hindutva and Modi or will Congress be successful in finding a new path with the help of Muslim appeasement? What the public is thinking will become clear on June 4.

The themes of Hindutva, nationalism, and appeasement in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. The BJP and Congress face off in a pivotal clash.

Nationalism vs Appeasement

Noted international criceter from Gujarat --- now retired --- swashbuckling, sweeping, swift Yusuf Pathan Sweeps Muslims In West Bengal + Already, As If, He Is A Winner In The MP-Polling In That State, Thanks to his cricket colleague + captain Saurabh Ganguly, now talent-hunting amid the "established cricket players" for his "Didi" Mamata Banerjee so that her party TMC wins "many seats in West Bengal and around up to the N-E including Sikkim in the ongoing Lok Sabha elections". To sway the Muslim voters --- almost, 52 % of the state --- "YusufJee" or "YusufBhai" of Yusuf Pathan is insidiously, assuredly spreading his [Pathan-branded macho charm], amicably talk to the voters on why they should vote for the TMC, discard all others right away. The voters, majority of them Muslims, are cheerfully heeding to him giving every (im)possible indication of voting for the TMC en masse, come what may. As for his winning the MP-poll from West Bengal, it is widely said to be already an assured 'yes' and he will be MP this year itself, "come what may". Add to that, Yusuf Pathan will also campaign for 'normal' TMC candidates as well, say insiders jovially.&nbsp;

Yusuf Pathan campaigns for TMC in West Bengal's Lok Sabha elections, targeting Muslim voters with charm and strategic endorsements.

Yusuf Sweeps Muslims

Unbelievable But True: this photo and more such truly revealing pix featuring today's most ardent, intense political enemies, rivals --- Suvendu Adhikari, Mamata Banerjee --- constantly swearing at each other are otherwise "Stop Press" confidantes to each other stunning, silencing fully stupefied, stunned observers of both's supporters, describe many. The latter are even many pix of theirs together to confirm their assured claims that as of now have not yet received any reaction from either the BJP, TMC or any other organisation or persona, say many, thereby raising the confirmation-theories abov the credential theories of this pic and more such in different poses.

Discover the hidden side of political rivals Suvendu Adhikari and Mamata Banerjee as stunning photos reveal their confidential camaraderie.

Unbelievable But True

Independence In 2014: Accept it or not. Currently, there is a raging exchange of altercations about when India got independence? Most say, 2014, the year of Narendra Modi becoming Prime Minister, he publicly giving all round freedom to the country, its (shackled) people till then, say, castewise, creedwise etc. Those who doggedly maintained India got independence in 1947 were turned to miniscule numbers as they were termed privileged, hence, have no place in the Bharatiya Samaj that compose more than 99.9% country-people who believed and still believe in Bharat Varsha swadheen in 2014 and not before that. And, the swadhinta continues unabated with no hindrance of any kind. As for those --- almost, nil --- who subscribe to the country's actual freedom as per declaration of Subhas Chandra Bose are almost nil. 2014 Jindabaad, shout they all.

Controversy over India's independence in 2014 reignites as Narendra Modi's leadership is scrutinized.

Independence In 2014

Sharaan Stumps Salman: That too in Dubai, within the kingdom / precincts of "mighty" D gang...Sharaan is S/o "illustrious" Sanjay Dutt, now all set to contest the ongoing Lok Sabha elections on Akhilesh Yadav-headed Samajwadi Party ticket. Sharaan --- still unseen by all --- is said to be dashing, debonair, diabolic, just about 100% tailor made for "Aaj Ka No Holds Barred Macho Roles". Salman Khan, according to top sources, has heeded to 'D', opted for Sharaan, he will enact Salman Khan in his US $100-Tn worth film on himself, emanating from last Sunday's open shoot out at his Bandra residence, a ready made film for "all round macho SalluBhai". But now, he will do all in the film except, his own role. That'll be donned by the "D" discovery, Sharaan, thanks to Sanjay Dutt approaching him to launch Sharaan. A success, surely, admit insiders.Truly, Sharaan Stumps Salman, agree insiders.

Sharaan Dutt, son of Sanjay Dutt, surprises Salman Khan in Dubai, altering Bollywood's landscape. Political ambitions clash with film industry egos.

Sharaan Stumps Salman

Heatwaves are becoming more frequent and intense, and India’s sweltering summers constitute a worrying trend rather than only a seasonal annoyance. Millions of people in the nation are affected by climate change, which is having an irreversible negative influence on their health, way of life, and environment as temperatures rise to record heights.  Having a better understanding of the heatwave phenomenon: in recent times, heatwaves, which are defined as extended periods of abnormally high temperatures, have become more frequent in India. Not only temperature spikes, but these extreme weather occurrences cause prolonged, scorching heat waves that strain communities to breaking point.  ROOTCAUSES: India is seeing an increasing number of heatwaves due to a number of variables. Heat is trapped in densely populated places due to the “Heat Island effect,“ which is a result of urbanisation, deforestation, and industry. Furthermore, the problem is made worse by climate change, which intensifies heat waves and modifies weather patterns.  Human cost: Heat waves have far-reaching effects that go beyond just being uncomfortable; they seriously jeopardise people’s health and well-being. Heat-related ailments like heatstroke, dehydration, and heat exhaustion are more common in vulnerable positions, which include the elderly, children, and outdoor labourers. Regrettably, there has been a national rise in heat-related fatalities associated with heatwaves.  Economic Repercussions: Heatwaves have a significant negative impact on the economy, impacting everything from agriculture to tourism. Severe heatwaves frequently result in crop failures, water scarcity, and livestock losses, endangering livelihoods and food security. Furthermore, businesses that depend on outside labour must deal with decreased productivity and increased workplace risks.  Impact on the Environment: Heatwaves also have an adverse effect on the environment, worsening wildfires, aggravating drought conditions, and endangering biodiversity. Long-term heat stress causes ecosystems to struggle, which disrupts natural habitats and creates ecological imbalances.  Various adaptation and mitigation techniques are being implemented by India to respond to the growing threat posed by heatwaves. These include infrastructure upgrades targeted at increasing resilience and decreasing susceptibility, urban green areas, heat action plans, and early warning systems.  Conclusion: India’s growing heatwave pattern serves as a grim reminder of the pressing need to address climate change. It is critical to give priority to initiatives aimed at reducing greenhouse emissions, creating resilient communities, and shielding the most vulnerable from the effects of intense heat as temperatures rise. We can only hope to address this urgent issue and ensure a sustainable future for future generations by working together and demonstrating a strong sense of commitment.

Heatwaves are becoming more frequent and intense, and India’s sweltering summers constitute a worrying trend rather than only a seasonal annoyance

India’s Sweltering Reality : Unveiling the Rising Trend of Heatwaves

Imagine a piece of scorching digital art instead of a baseball legend signing a digital autograph on a unique trading card. That is the fundamental concept of NFTs. They serve as ownership certificates for digital assets kept on a secure digital ledger called a blockchain. This implies that objects that are unique, like music, artwork, or even video game items, can be transparently tracked.  So, what effects are NFTs having on different industries? Now, let’s look at a few instances.  Music and art: When it comes to creative fields, NFTs have changed everything. By eliminating middlemen and gaining more control over their earnings, artists can now sell digital works directly to fans. NFTs are being used by musicians to release limited-edition albums or behind-the-scenes clips, among other exclusive content.  Games : Through NFTs, play-to-earn experiences are emerging in the gaming industry. Picture yourself winning exclusive in-game goods or characters that you can keep and possibly even trade for real money with other players. This takes in-game spending to a whole new level!  Accessories :- As NFTs, or virtual designer clothes for your avatar in the metaverse (the virtual world), luxury brands are making digital wearables. The NFT process is also being applied to traditional collectibles, such as trading cards, enabling safe ownership and possibly even fractional ownership, in which several individuals may own a portion of the digital collectible.  Moving past the hype: However, NFTs are more than just ostentatious digital artwork and pricey collectibles. Supply chain management is one of the industries they could revolutionise. Imagine being able to follow a diamond from the mine to the market, with every stage being validated via an NFTY on a blockchain. Customers could be guaranteed ethical sourcing and transparency as a result.  It’s critical to keep in mind that NFTs are still a relatively new technology and that there are still issues to be resolved, such as potential scams, market volatility, and environmental concerns arising from blockchain technology’s high energy consumption. However, given the wide range of possible uses, this is undoubtedly an area to keep an eye on as technology develops.  Are NFTs the way of the future or just a fad? While time will tell, one thing is certain: they are causing waves in a variety of industries and opening up fascinating opportunities for the digital world.&nbsp;

Imagine a piece of scorching digital art instead of a baseball legend signing a digital autograph on a unique trading card. That is the fundamental concept of NFTs.

Exploration of how NFTs (non-fungible tokens) are causing waves

The world of lucid dreaming is a mysterious domain that invites exploration in the quiet hours of the night, while sleep envelops our consciousness. Lucid dreaming is a special chance to take an active role in our nocturnal adventures, in contrast to traditional dreams in which we are merely observers. So, let’s discover the keys to taking charge of your nighttime adventures as we explore this mysterious world where the lines between reality and fantasy are blurred. The basic definition of lucid dreaming is a condition of increased awareness that takes place while in a dream. These dreams give the dreamer the capacity to regulate their behaviour and environment since they make them aware that they are dreaming. Through the use of lucid dreaming, people can explore new frontiers in their creativity, understanding, and self-discovery.  Methods for Inducing Lucid Dreams: There are numerous methods and approaches available to help people who want to delve deeper into the realm of lucid dreaming. These techniques, which range from reality checks and dream journals to meditation and visualisation exercises, help to raise consciousness and increase the possibility of experiencing lucidity while you sleep. Although these methods’ efficacy may differ from person to person, persistent effort and perseverance can produce significant outcomes that open the door to an endless universe of possibilities in the dream world.  Examining the limits of consciousness: As we delve deeper into the realm of lucid dreaming, we find ourselves in an environment that is as big and diverse as the human imagination. The only thing stopping us from achieving our goals are our own imaginations. From taking to the skies to exploring fantastical settings, the possibilities are endless. Beyond the excitement of the chase, however, lucid dreaming presents a singular chance for reflection and self-discovery. Lucid dreamers can discover unrealized potential and acquire important insights into their waking lives by facing anxieties, resolving issues, and accessing the wisdom of the subconscious mind.  The Possible Advantages of Dream Interpretation: Emerging research indicates that lucid dreaming may have real advantages for mental health and well-being due to its attraction for adventure and exploration. Furthermore, lucid dreaming has been linked to increased creativity, problem-solving, and cognitive capacities. People can access a wealth of unrealized possibilities hidden deep within their own thoughts by mastering the technique of lucid dreaming.   In conclusion, there is the possibility of lucid dreaming. serves as a reminder that the limits of consciousness are more pliable and flexible than previously thought. We can develop, explore, and transform in the dream world with no limits to our imagination. Lucid dreaming provides a doorway to new horizons and limitless possibilities, whether one is looking for adventure, wisdom, or just a brief escape from the real world.&nbsp;

Lucid dreaming is a mysterious domain that invites exploration in the quiet hours of the night, while sleep envelops our consciousness

Unlocking the hidden realms:- exploring the enigmatic world of lucid dreaming

The world of lucid dreaming is a mysterious domain that invites exploration in the quiet hours of the night, while sleep envelops our consciousness

Elections constitute the steady pulse of choice, accountability, and advancement in the democratic symphony. Elections are a fundamental part of democracy and a symbol of citizen empowerment that promotes social cohesiveness, political stability, and the advancement of the country. So, come along with me and set out to unravel the complex web of reasons why elections are not only important but also essential to the life and vigour of any nation in this piece.  Every election is really about the power of choice, which is the cornerstone of democracy. Elections give people a hallowed stage on which to express their desires, hopes, and worries, influencing the course of their country. By casting a ballot, people become active participants in shaping their community’s future and use the powerful power of their votes to influence the structure of government. This empowerment fosters a culture of civic engagement and involvement as well as a sense of ownership and responsibility, all of which are essential components for the survival of a robust democracy. Furthermore, elections act as a last resort for accountability, ensuring that public officials are accountable to the people they represent. The public scrutiny process serves as a strong deterrent against the misuse of authority, corruption, and authoritarian inclinations, guaranteeing that those in positions of responsibility remain devoted stewards of the public trust. As a result, elections protect the delicate balance between individual liberty and state authority by acting as a potent deterrent against the consolidation of uncontrolled power.  Elections are important for political stability and social cohesiveness, in addition to guaranteeing accountability. Elections reduce the possibility of violent conflict, civil unrest, and political instability by offering a calm and orderly method of transforming power. Elections have a unifying effect in diverse communities by bridging gaps in ideology, race, and religion and creating a feeling of national cohesion based on the pursuit of shared values. Moreover, the election process’s intrinsic plurality and inclusivity act as catalysts for communication, accommodation, reconciliation, fostering a climate of acceptance, and deference to dissenting opinions that are necessary for the coexistence of various populations within the country. Furthermore, elections are a catalyst for advancement and development, stimulating social change, economic expansion, and innovation. Election campaigns generate public conversation and debate by presenting opposite viewpoints and policy ideas. This encourages the sharing of ideas and investigation.  To sum up, elections are the foundation of democracy because they are alive with the energy of public engagement, responsibility, stability, and advancement. The importance of elections as a source of optimism, a defence against despotism, and a driver of change is greater than ever as we negotiate the complexity of today’s world. As a result, let us value and preserve the election process, since it is in the voting booth that we give life to the admirable principles of democracy and clear the way for a better future for future generations.

Elections constitute the steady pulse of choice, accountability, and advancement in the democratic symphony. Elections are a fundamental part of democracy and a symbol of citizen empowerment that promotes social cohesiveness, political stability, and the advancement of the country

Why Elections Are Necessary For Every Nation: The Vital Pulse of Democracy

Everybody has creativity concealed inside them, just waiting for the perfect key to unlock it. It’s like a treasure waiting to be discovered. However, how can we locate this key, and what is it exactly? Discovering the mysteries of creative thinking and problem-solving will require us to take a voyage through the mental maze. Consider the enormous span of our brains as the puzzle pieces that make up creativity. From creativity to memory to critical thinking, these pieces illustrate various facets of the mind. What creative masterpieces do they produce together, though? Ideas run amok in a carnival of the imagination in our brains, which resemble playgrounds. Researchers studying the brainstem have shown that creativity is not limited to a single area of the brain but rather an intricate interaction between multiple areas operating in unison. A flame of creativity is ignited by inspiration, whether we are walking in a sunny meadow or thinking about the secrets of the cosmos. It can happen at any time, but we need to learn to channel inspiration’s energy and turn it into action because inspiration by itself is insufficient. Creativity has no boundaries; it is fueled by inquiry and discovery. We give ourselves access to a universe of limitless possibilities when we release ourselves from the constraints of habit and tradition. Thus, we should have the courage to imagine, to rebel, and to create. Play is the creative language, the vehicle by which we communicate the most audacious ideas and fanciful visions. Play stimulates our imaginations and ignites our creativity, whether we’re drawing on napkins or creating forts in the sand. Failure is the start of the new journey, not its conclusion. Failure is the means by which we develop, learn, and change; therefore, accept failure as a friend rather than an enemy, and don’t be scared to trip and fall. In collaborative settings, where ideas clash and merge to create something more creative than the sum of their parts, creativity flourishes. Thus, connect, reach out, and work together, because when we do things as a team, we can do anything. Creativity is the thread that unites us all in the larger scheme of life. It is what defines our legacy, what propels us onward, and what gives us our humanity. Therefore, don’t wait for inspiration to knock; instead, go for it and grab it with both hands. Let your imagination go wild and reach new heights by embracing your creative potential. The world is waiting for your network, after all!!

Learn how different facets of the brain work together to foster creative thinking and discover how inspiration, play, and collaboration can transform ideas into reality.

The Creative Code: Deciphering The Science Of Innovative Thinking

..Against Narendra Modi For Ensuing Lok Sabha Elections in Varanasi / Benares / Kashi As Akhil Bharatiya Hindu MahaSabha candidate Kinnar Mahamandaleshwar Hemangi Sakhi Opposite, Of All, Narendra Modi Himself, "Shell-Shocking Almost All In Varanasi, turning them agog, aghast, astounded", comment numerous many fully zapped, puzzled, quizzed. They are seriously brooding on "how come a Kinnar [hermaphrodite] is placed opposite Modi in Varanasi; in other words, kinnar is on equal status with 'him'; in other words, 'HemangiJee' is on equal stature as that of him!" The "timeless city of Varanasi has suddenly woken up from its characteristic deep slumber to criss-cross discuss / debate / conference etc on Hemangi Sakhi, the "once in a millennium phenomenon around her"...Against Modi.&nbsp;

In Varanasi, a surprising turn as Kinnar Mahamandaleshwar Hemangi Sakhi challenges Narendra Modi in Lok Sabha elections, igniting debates on equality."

Against Modi

The digital wave is spreading across industries in today’s fast-paced world, changing how we communicate, work, and live. But might the inherent risks of this technological revolution outweigh its benefits? Let’s examine the many effects of digitalization and dive into its complexity.
 The positive effects included are:
 Digitalization provides unmatched connectivity, efficiency, and ease of use. It enables people and organisations to do more with less by facilitating quick communication and streamlining procedures. Global markets are accessible to businesses, creative startups can be started by entrepreneurs, and we students have very easy access to a wealth of knowledge resources, thanks to digitalization, which has also reduced obstacles to employment, healthcare, and education. Additionally, innovation is fueled by digitalization. It drives innovations in a wide range of disciplines, including artificial intelligence, renewable energy, and healthcare technology. It encourages innovation and teamwork, making it possible for people with different backgrounds to join together and tackle challenging issues. Entrepreneurship thrives in the digital sphere, where bold visionaries may realise ideas at a pace they have never seen before.
 The Not So Good: But there are also negative aspects to the digital revolution. Due to the possibility of being left behind, it makes inequality worse and worse. Social inequality is sustained by the digital divide, which increases the distance between the rich and the underprivileged. Furthermore, worries about security and privacy are heightened by digitalization. The autonomy of individuals is at risk because they are susceptible to manipulation due to data breaches, identity theft, and spying.  Moreover, digitalization presents environmental issues. Large volumes of energy are consumed, and electronic trash is produced by the growth of electronic devices and data centres. Climate change and environmental degradation could be made worse by the digital footprint if sustainable practices are not followed. Furthermore, the quick speed at which technology is developing might upend entire sectors and ways of life, which could result in job losses and unstable economies.  Sailing through the terrain: An approach is necessary to maximise the advantages of digitalization while reducing its hazards. A sustainable, ethical, and inclusive digital future is something that corporations, individuals, and policymakers all have a part to play in. The digital divide may be closed, and marginalised populations can be empowered through investments in digital infrastructure and education. Furthermore, strict laws are required to guarantee data security and safeguard people’s privacy. To increase confidence in digital technology, transparency and accountability must be given top priority. Businesses must also adopt ethical procedures and give sustainability and social responsibility top priority in their operations. Digital literacy and critical thinking abilities are necessary for navigating the complexity of the digital world on an individual basis. We may reduce our environmental impact and safeguard our privacy by being aware of our internet actions and consumption patterns.   To sum up, there are benefits and drawbacks to digitalization. Only if we approach it cautiously and strategically will its transformational force have the capacity to positively influence society. We can take advantage of digitalization’s advantages while reducing its threats by promoting cooperation, creativity, and inclusivity. With open minds and a dedication to creating a digital future that benefits everybody, let’s set off on this journey together!!!!

Discover the effects of digitalization – its benefits, drawbacks, and the path to a sustainable future amidst technological revolution.

Seizing Digitalization: An Adventure filled with possibilities and difficulties

Dr. Alon Ben-Meir*
Since Hamas’ savagery of 1,200 innocent Israelis on October 7, one thing became abundantly clear. Netanyahu, and no one else, indirectly precipitated Hamas’ attack that led to the unfolding horror in Gaza, which could have been avoided. His preoccupation with his travails, his dereliction of duty, his voracious thirst to cling to power to save his skin, and his dismal failure to articulate an endgame to the war against Hamas have all come back to haunt him. The widespread demonstrations in Israel demanding his resignation amid the war establish the extent of public disgust with his leadership. He must now resign not only because of his negligence of duty and tragic misreading of Hamas’ intentions before the war, but for the dreadful damage he may inflict on the country if he continues to govern.  The facts on the ground, his actions, how he conducts the war, and his public statements affirm ten reasons why Netanyahu must resign now.  1- Hamas’ October 7 attack took place under his watch. As Prime Minister, he not only refused to take any responsibility but tried to blame others for his disastrous failure. He dismissed reports that Hamas was planning a massive attack on Israel, claiming that Hamas is simply incapable of carrying an attack of such magnitude. For one who claims to be “Mr. Security,” Netanyahu, as the prime minister, must be held accountable. The attack and his response demonstrated his self-conceit and cowardice to take responsibility. Any other prime minister with an ounce of integrity would have resigned, but not Netanyahu.  2- While he was busy trying to ‘reform the judiciary,” which would have destroyed Israel's democracy, he paid no heed to Hamas’ planning and training for the attack for more than a year. For sixteen years under his watch, Hamas was building a massive network of tunnels, nearly 400 miles long, approximately two-thirds the length of the entire New York City subway. If he knew about this colossal infrastructure and did nothing about it, he should have resigned. If he was unaware of Hamas’s incredible design to put up such resistance to fight from underground, which he should have been as the prime minister, he should have resigned. Any leader in his position with a morsel of accountability would have resigned, but not Netanyahu.  3- For years, Netanyahu allowed billions of dollars from Qatar to flow into Hamas’ coffers. In 2019 and subsequent years, he repeatedly stated that “whoever is against a Palestinian state should be for [Qatar’s funding of Hamas],” knowing full well that Hamas was using more than 50 percent of the funds to build tunnels, procure and manufacture weapons, and train tens of thousands of its fighters for the next war. Still, until October, he continued the practice of greasing Hamas's war machine, which Israeli civilians paid for at a horrific price. Anyone in Netanyahu’s place would have resigned for empowering Hamas to undertake such an unprecedented attack, but not Netanyahu.  4- The Israel-Hamas war continues to rage, and more than six months later, Netanyahu still has no exit strategy and no clear path how to achieve his elusive goal of eradicating Hamas. He knows that once the war ends, his political career will also come to an end. Thus, he has every incentive to prolong the war, hoping that a decisive victory against Hamas will exonerate him. Meanwhile, hundreds of Israeli soldiers and tens of thousands of innocent Palestinians are dying because of his abysmal mishandling of the war. The blood of Israelis and Palestinians who are dying in vain is on his hands. Any responsible head of state would have resigned for his deadly mismanagement of the war, but not Netanyahu.  5- Netanyahu maintained all along that Hamas was under control, describing it as a ragtag organization with firecrackers. Hamas’ attack and its fighting abilities and skills have starkly demonstrated how these extremist Palestinians have evolved and become an arduous fighting force that even the mighty Israeli military cannot defeat at will. This has been the second-longest war in Israel's history, and no one but Netanyahu is to blame for his catastrophic miscalculations of Hamas’ prowess and resistance. Any prime minister with minimal self-respect who made such a momentous mistake would have resigned, but not Netanyahu.  6- Since he returned to power in 2008, Netanyahu has maintained a strict blockade over Gaza. It is hard to describe the despair and hopelessness that has swept the population of nearly 2.1 million living in what amounts to a concentration camp. More than 70 percent of the population is under the age of 25, existing without hope, deprived of ever realizing their dreams. Netanyahu used Hamas’ threats against Israel as an excuse to justify his brutal blockade, knowing that he was sowing poisonous seeds infecting every Palestinian youth who grew up aspiring for nothing but revenge against Israel. Netanyahu had created a tinderbox in Gaza that was bound to explode, and it did. Any conscientious prime minister would have resigned, but not Netanyahu.  7- Although Israel has every right to defend itself, and the war against Hamas can be justified on moral and national security grounds with the goal of not allowing Hamas to reconstitute itself, there was simply no justification for the massive bombardments, which were in part indiscriminate and laced with a crude desire for revenge. How can one explain the death of nearly 33,000 Palestinians, 70 percent of whom were women and children? Has Netanyahu ever thought of the Palestinian people as human beings with hopes and dreams, just like any Israeli? Has it ever occurred to him that for every Palestinian child who was killed in this war, four or five are born to avenge their death? The cycle of retribution will continue to grind, courtesy of Netanyahu, who has lost his way. The trail of death and devastation has wholly overshadowed the butchering of 1,200 Israelis. Netanyahu has rendered Israel morally bankrupt—a stigma that stained Jewish values while diminishing the world’s sympathy and admiration for the Jewish state and giving rise to antisemitism. Any prime minister with even a touch of compassion and concern would have resigned, but not Netanyahu.  8- Throughout his sixteen-year tenure as Prime Minister, Netanyahu was proud of violating the Palestinians’ human rights and prouder to squash their aspiration for statehood. In January 2024, he stated, “I will not compromise on full Israeli security control over the entire area in the west of Jordan – and this is contrary to a Palestinian state.” He deliberately and consistently misled the Israelis to believe that the occupation of the West Bank and the blockade of Gaza were central to their security. Nothing but the occupation was more ominous to the security of the state. The never-ending violence in the West Bank, which is entwined with the Palestinians in Gaza's despairing discontent and vice versa, attests to his dismal failure. Today’s Israeli-Palestinian relations, under Netanyahu’s watch, has reached its nadir, worse than it has ever been since 1948. Any prime minister imbued in the history and the inescapable reality of Israeli-Palestinian coexistence would have resigned, but not Netanyahu.  9- No Israeli prime minister has so successfully polarized the public more than Netanyahu by forming the most extremist government in Israel’s history. The Gaza war has further deepened the division between hard-core right-wing Israelis who want to reoccupy Gaza and push the Palestinians to the sea, and those Israelis who want to see an end to the occupation and the blockade and seek peace. But the polarization, hatred, and malice among the Israeli public are of no concern to Netanyahu, who is solely focused on his political survival and to hell with the country. Adding to that is the rupture that he created between Israel and the world’s Jewry, who are becoming ever more alienated from the country that they cherished and loved. They were proud of its miraculous achievements, only to see it marred in endless violent conflict. This alone would have compelled any prime minister to resign, but not Netanyahu.  10- No prime minister in Israel’s history has alienated the US—the country’s closest and irreplaceable ally—than Netanyahu. US military support, political cover, and financial aid to Israel since its inception have surpassed any other country. Successive American administrations have stood by Israel through thick and thin and never wavered in their commitment to its national security. And while Israel at present needs the US more than ever before, Netanyahu has once again shown how shameless he is. Whereas he went down on his knees begging for more bombs and explosives and political cover, he defied the Biden administration at every turn.  Indeed, no Israeli prime minister has shown more chutzpah (shameless audacity) than Netanyahu. Last March, he stated that “Israel is a sovereign country which makes its decisions by the will of its people and not based on pressures from abroad, including from the best of friends.” Netanyahu's constant rebuffing of President Biden regarding the desperate need for food and medicine for the starving and sick Palestinians in Gaza illustrates how dispassionate and cruel, and how ungrateful and foolish he is. For that alone, anyone else in his stead would have resigned, but not Netanyahu.  Israel’s founders must now be turning in their graves as Netanyahu is now writing and directing Israel’s darkest chapter. Under his watch, today's Israel is facing a fateful crossroad: how the Gaza war ends and what follows will determine Israel’s future. The country will become either what was destined to be a “light onto other nations” or an apartheid state, a pariah, and an occupying power that lives by the sword.  The Israeli public must continue to pour into the streets by the hundreds of thousands, demanding new elections within a few weeks. They must spare no legitimate means, including civil disobedience and continuing labor strikes, to force Netanyahu out of power and save the country.  Each day Netanyahu remains in power, he poses a greater danger to Israel than its worst enemy.
*Dr. Alon Ben-Meir is a retired professor of international relations, most recently at the Center for Global Affairs at NYU.

Amidst escalating tensions, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu faces criticism and demands for resignation over handling of Hamas attack and Gaza war.

Netanyahu Is Unfit To Serve; He Must Resign Now

Food For Thought...Is it not apt, appropriate, more-than-about-time to chuck him out of soup by a single, swift blow / whiff with "mere" fingers to be next ensconced in "live happily thereafter, for ever and sing la-la-laale-la...". 'Pain in the u---' be done away with right away with for long lasting 'all round relief as then when the Rakshasas, Demons, Frankestein, Ravan etc demolished after which the peole of all hues en masse lived happily thereafter in utmost all round relief and breathed last. Bv till that happened, it was unbearable for them like now. Disparities, discriminations, -Ve distinctions, deprivations, denials are writ large all around thus excruciatingly painful, intolerable thus unbearable thus its of utmost necessity to "blow him away with a whiff"...Food for thought thus, say innumerable many. Yahoo.&nbsp;

Dive into a thought-provoking exploration of societal change, drawing parallels with mythical victories over evil to inspire a movement towards universal happiness and peace.

Food For Thought

New Congress C/o Rahul Gandhi: Ongoing practically refurbished, revamped Congress C/o Rahul Gandhi is being unliked, intolerated by many at all levels in the party, thus, they are leaving the party --- it has made them multi / mega riches for many generations with no qualms of even an minutest blotch of any kind whatsoever --- for obvious reasons to save their "crocodile-like impenetrable skin, so far unscathed, untouched, uncared for by the "indifferent" Congress High Command freely allowing 'them' to let the accusations stick to the Nehru-Gandhi including Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi et al when they've'n out of power since 1989 Parliament election results' declaration. That is, they are out of power for 35 years. In these three and a half decades, many non-Gandhi entities have been in power, their charisma more or less unexplored, thanks to the pioneering Bofors --- mid-'80s --- that takes all post-1989 ghapla under its wrap eliciting Congress is corrupt thanks to Nehru-Gandhis. But factually, its the non-Gandhis, non-Nehrus who are administering Bharat now and so since 1989, as in 1977-79, 1989-1991, Atal Behari Vajpayee-Government et al + now. What account of that, unassumingly ask many in many a party virtually stunned. They argue, when the governance-rules are same as then, how can there be no corruption? Yes in the current governance, there is no allegation levelled as yet but...the but factor remains, say many. To eliminate such "rumours", start on a clean slate post-2024 Lok Sabha poll results, Rahul Gandhi is overhauling, refurbising, remodelling, rekindling the Congress, making it all-round tailor-made for a new type of all people-benefitting-governance in the country, courtesy obviously, Rahul Gandhi.

Unpacking the Congress Party's revamp led by Rahul Gandhi, facing internal challenges and aiming for a rejuvenated political stance in India.

New Congress C/o Rahul Gandhi

Ajit Pawar Deleted, Outright: No more, he is relevant, operational, tingler, manipulator, player, strategist, healer, or, maniqulator, manouvrer, hider etc in Maharashtra as he has abysmally failed to rope in 100% NCP MLAs owing allegiance to Sharad Pawar in to his NCP despite it being recognised as the real NCP...Thus, boo to Ajit Pawar. Thus, his current God Fathers Narendra Modi, Amit Shah, Jagat Prasad Nadda remain the real Dada while Ajit Pawar is dysfunctional, deflated, dwindled...He is at sheer, pitiable miniscule mercy of N-A-J (Narendra-Amit-Jagat), guffaw numerous many in the state without any slightes commisseration with Pawar, its "end being imminent and very near any moment, say many, thus, over to N-A-J in Maharashtra from now on. ...Ajit Pawar thus deleted out right.&nbsp;

Ajit Pawar's attempt to consolidate power within Maharashtra's NCP falters, marking a pivotal shift towards BJP's leadership trio: Modi, Shah, and Nadda.

Ajit Pawar Deleted

Shhhh...Hush...Be Pin Drop Silent...Down Below The Water, Watch Out...ThereUnder Could Be Dragon / Shark / Dolphin adroitly trained to jump out of the water to grab from you your stealthily packed names of your "all types of shady, surreptitious, stealthy" electoral bonds donors, if exposed in any wax will "zero" your, the party's all round credibility, credulousness for all times to come...What then, Huh?!? Ever thought about that? Apparently, no, I presume, You being omnipotent, thus, omniscient...But that doesn't in any way help you escape the wrath of the top powers that are the moment they come to know of the names of the "shady" donors of electoral bonds given to you, gotcha? Your credibility then vis-a-vis your "honesty-posing" will not crumble but shatter like nine pins in the quickest ever jiffy, getcha? Thus, be cautious, forewarned, tactful now itself leaving no trace of racketeering electoral bonds that any way if all are "ultra damaging, booby trap for you, for your destruction, annihilation...Don't fall in that trap". Thus, Shhh...Hush.&nbsp;

Dive into the covert world of electoral bond donors and the peril it poses to political transparency and trust. Will secrecy shatter credibility?

Shhhh...Hush

"All's Tip-Top": "Extraordinarily Orderly, Immaculately Packed / Stacked / Framed / Exhibited Evincing Unity, Oneness among them --- Ajit Pawar, Eknath Shinde, Devendra Fadnavis --- in Mahayuti alliance in Maharashtra, strongly tipped to be in their favour in the ensuing Lok Sabha polls to be with Delhi and its "double engine sarkar scheme to actively partake of in Narendra Modi's 'states, Centre advance shoulder-to-shoulder 24x7 for constant all-round, all-level growth in all fronts'. This the only way to cover up the deficiencies in required all-sectors' all development issues that already have pushed the state including its Mumbai far behind, objectively say those in know of these matters fully, matter-of-factly. They admit, there's a general consensus on immediate requirement of all-round refurbishment of Maiarashtra and Mumbai so that they are taken out of their current all round "decay, slump, slouch, rickety, ramshackle infrastructures", resembling falling down, wiping any day now. To prevent it, support for above entities to restore Mumbai, Maharashtra's "All's Tip-Top".

Mahayuti alliance in Maharashtra shows unity with Ajit Pawar, Eknath Shinde, and Fadnavis, aiming for major growth in Mumbai and state-wide improvements.

All's Tip-Top

Dr. Alon Ben-Meir*
It is hard to fathom why, over the past eight years since the failed military coup in 2016 in particular, Erdogan has and still is rampaging against his people and defying his Western allies with near impunity. What makes this even more absurd is that Turkey is a NATO member state, which requires all members to uphold democratic principles while fully adhering to its military doctrine and foreign policy that directly and indirectly impacts its unity and effectiveness. Western officials who have been asked this question often revert to the explanation that Turkey occupies a critical geostrategic location between East and West and is the energy hub for Europe and a bridge that plays a critical geopolitical role. In addition, Turkey is important to NATO as it hosts the bloc’s long-range missile systems, and to US military operations in the Middle East, especially the strategic use of the Incirlik Air Base in Adana, close to the Syrian border. Whereas some of these elucidations may have some merit, it is hard to square them with Erdogan’s egregious human rights violations and abrogation of Western values, which he must uphold. To effect a change in his behavior, it is essential to first survey and put in context the litany of his egregious domestic and foreign transgressions and take the necessary measures that correspond to the scope of his misconduct. Erdogan’s human rights violations Sadly, Erdogan’s voracious lust for human rights violations seems to have no boundaries and transcends any scale of cruelty and brutality. During the prolonged state of emergency that he imposed following the failed coup in 2016, there have been and continue to this day widespread human rights violations, which include arbitrary detentions, infringements of freedom of association and expression, violations of the right to work, and freedom of movement. In addition, he fired thousands of people, including public servants and teachers, and prosecuted journalists, often without adequate due process. Torture and ill-treatment became routine in police custody and prisons, which included severe beatings, sexual assault, and deprivation of sleep. To make matters worse, he detained human rights defenders and activists, intended to exert pressure on civil society groups and NGOs critical of him. In addition, Erdogan detained thousands, accusing them, without any proof, of having links with terrorist organizations. He dismissed 150,000 from their jobs, falsely accusing them of affiliation with the Gülen movement, which Turkey alone considers a terrorist group, and also sought the extradition of Turkish citizens from other countries who are allegedly affiliated with the movement. He persecuted scores of academics, wrongly accusing them of spreading militant propaganda, and removed thousands of judges and prosecutors and replaced them with lackeys to do his bidding. And he led a witch hunt throughout the Turkish air force, accusing many officers of being Gülenists and behind the coup. He regularly bypasses legal procedures, and engages in enforced disappearances and illegal transfers. The extensive use of his emergency decrees has eroded the rule of law in Turkey, drastically limited civil society activities, and nurtured impunity. Erdogan aggressively pursued those he perceived as critics, especially journalists, while blocking websites, media outlets, and general restrictions on the internet, with over 100,000 websites blocked, including many pro-Kurdish ones. In particular, Erdogan targeted the Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP), which predominantly represents the Kurdish community, by shutting down the party and attacking the rights of millions of Kurdish voters, deliberately subverting parliamentary democracy. Erdoğan encouraged anti-LGBT speeches and social media posts by top government officials, which have become more common, and targets LGBT students, particularly on days like International Women’s Day. In this connection, Erdoğan withdrew from the Istanbul Convention, a treaty designed to protect women from violence and femicide. Finally, but certainly not exhaustively, Erdogan has systematically violated Turkey’s substantial Kurdish community, using excessive force, torture, and violence against Kurdish women while destroying their housing and cultural heritage, which has become standard under his reign of terror. Erdogan’s defiance of his Western allies Since the failed coup, many contentious issues have strained the relationship between Turkey, NATO, and the United States, and there seems to be no sign that any of these conflicting issues can be mitigated as long as Erdogan is allowed to leverage Turkey’s “unique” geostrategic importance to the West. Erdogan’s human rights abuses, democratic backsliding, and erosion of the rule of law in Turkey have been and remain significant causes of friction between the two sides, which in fact led the vast majority of EU states to reject the country’s candidacy. Erdogan has also initiated foreign policies contrary to the alliance's military and political interests. Turkey's purchase of the Russian S-400 missile defense system has been a primary source of tension, leading to US sanctions. This move was incompatible with Turkey's commitments as a NATO ally. Adding to that is that Turkey's military interventions in Syria and its forceful posture in the Eastern Mediterranean have often been at odds with US strategic interests in these regions. In that connection, the US support for Kurdish forces in Syria, which is seen as vital in the fight against ISIS, has infuriated Erdogan, who views the Kurdish YPG militia as a terrorist group linked to the PKK. Turkey’s growing relationship with Russia, typified by the S-400 purchase, and its cautious stance toward China, particularly regarding the Uyghurs and cooperation in Syria, have been another source of constant friction and raised concerns in the US about Turkey's strategic alignment and commitment to NATO principles, which challenges the traditional dynamics within NATO and between the US and Turkey. The scope of disagreement between NATO and Turkey regarding Cyprus and Greece primarily involves territorial disputes and military tensions. Turkey's military presence in Northern Cyprus since 1974 and its maritime boundary disputes with Greece in the Eastern Mediterranean have led to heightened tensions. His threats to invade NATO member Greece and annex parts of EU member Cyprus over territorial disputes, particularly related to natural gas drilling rights, have been seen as undermining the safety and security of the region. These issues are compounded by Turkey's military exercises, which Greece and Cyprus view as violating their sovereignty and challenging the alliance's cohesion while complicating diplomatic relations within the region. Erdogan's objection to NATO membership of Sweden and Finland left the alliance troubled with essential points of dispute, including how to deal with Erdogan's voracious thirst to impose his will and how that might play out in any future disagreement. Erdogan blackmailed Sweden, in particular, to take a firmer stance against groups it considers terrorist organizations, such as the PKK. It was not until Sweden addressed Turkey's concerns, which included lifting an arms embargo against Turkey and enhancing anti-terrorism laws, that he finally conceded and allowed Sweden accession to NATO. There are other contentious issues between the US and Erdogan, including Erdogan's repeated demand to extradite Fethullah Gülen, whom he blames for the 2016 coup attempt. The US refused to comply, citing a lack of evidence. Another quarrelsome issue is the US and French recognition of the 1915 Armenian genocide committed by the Ottoman Empire, which Erdogan fervently denies. More recently, Erdogan has openly expressed support for Hamas, describing them not as terrorists but as "liberators" who are defending their land. Erdogan's statements highlight a significant divergence from Western perspectives, which classify Hamas as a terrorist organization. Erdogan's refusal to label it as such highlights his complicated relationship with regional powers and his efforts to position himself as a key player in Middle Eastern affairs. Erdogan’s hypocrisy was in full display when he refused to condemn Hamas’ savage attack that butchered 1,200 Israelis but accused Israel of behaving like a "war criminal" and committing "massacres" in Gaza and called for Israeli leaders to be tried for war crimes. Erdogan in the past has even gone as far as offering Turkish citizenship to Hamas officials, and has for years provided them with shelter. NATO’s share of the blame There is no doubt that Erdogan might have behaved differently had he been confronted by NATO and credibly been threatened with severe consequences if he did not change course and comply with NATO’s core requirements. NATO's failure to stand up to Erdogan, and its permissiveness in letting him violate its charter without penalties, has only encouraged Erdogan to become ever more ruthless and defiant, knowing he can do so with impunity. That is, NATO’s failure to demand that all member states adhere to its values erodes the foundation of the organization. And while it is difficult to take a stand against Turkey due to its contributions and immensely important strategic location, to allow it to continue uncritically is nothing but a slippery slope that will destroy the moral foundation of NATO. Another renegade is Hungary's President Orban, who became a de facto dictator and systematically violated human rights and freedom of the press and has not been called to task by NATO, which is only compounding the Organization’s malaise. Indeed, if NATO wants to maintain its cohesiveness and effectiveness as the military powerhouse that safeguards European security, especially at this juncture when the Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas war are raging, NATO cannot afford to allow any of its members to fan the flames. Thus, the time is overdue for NATO to take several punitive measures against Erdogan. Punitive measures Although the NATO Charter doesn't provide a mechanism to expel a member state, it is time for NATO to stop relying solely on political and diplomatic channels to address disagreements with Erdogan, which have been elusive on many levels, and instead resort to broad and transparent punitive measures. In taking such measures against a head of state like Erdogan for human rights violations or actions that defy NATO agreements, these measures must be considered in the context of the complexity of international law, diplomacy, and geopolitical relationships. These measures include: Imposing economic sanctions on Turkey, whether individual countries or groups of countries, such as those within the European Union. These could range from targeted sanctions affecting specific individuals or sectors to more comprehensive economic measures. The imposition of more sanctions, such as Turkey’s removal from the US F-35 program because of Erdogan’s military operation in Syria and his purchase of the S-400 system from Russia, offers one good example.Limiting cooperation and participation in NATO activities by member states, which could limit military cooperation or exclude Turkey from certain joint activities. These include disallowing Turkey from participating in specific NATO military exercises, stopping sharing sensitive intelligence, and excluding Turkey from NATO’s decision-making processes.Freezing or terminating bilateral or multilateral agreements between Turkey and other countries, or between Turkey and international organizations. This includes not receiving Turkish attaches, finding an alternative to the Incirlik Air Base in Turkey once the turmoil in Europe and the Middle East subsides, which Erdogan has been using as leverage, and suspending collaboration on particular projects, especially on defense cooperation. Many countries and international organizations can exert diplomatic pressure on Turkey by publicly expressing disapproval of specific actions through formal condemnations, public statements, and high-level diplomatic talks. And finally, international legal mechanisms can address human rights violations. Bodies like the International Criminal Court (ICC) can investigate allegations of human rights abuses and expose Erdogan for what he is.Notwithstanding Turkey’s geostrategic importance, NATO should weigh Turkey’s contribution to the alliance against Erdogan’s consistent defiance of what NATO stands for. NATO can make some concessions to accommodate a particular member state like Turkey. Still, it cannot compromise its core values, the foundation that sustains it as a viable and powerful military alliance.
*Dr. Alon Ben-Meir is a retired professor of international relations, most recently at the Center for Global Affairs at NYU. He teaches courses on international negotiation and Middle Eastern studies.

Diving deep into Erdogan's Turkey: Unpacking human rights abuses, NATO tensions, and the geopolitical dance at the crossroads of East and West.

The Hawk

Editorial & Analyses

Can Erdogan Shed His Duplicity And Do Something Right?

Inam Ansari

Editorial & Analyses

Can Erdogan Shed His Duplicity And Do Something Right?

Inam Ansari

More about Editorial & Analyses